Browse by Brand for Air Cleaners
- Excellent
- Above Average
- Average
- Below Average
- Poor
|
Brand Name |
Editor's Ratings |
Comments |
 |
 |
Best performance for all types of particle removal
rates including smoke and chemicals. Filters replacements are
fairly expensive. |
 |
 |
High performance and affordably priced with new
Lifetime Warranty. Low filter replacement costs. Does not remove
chemicals and high concentration of smoke odors. |
 |
 |
High performance with 10 year warranty.
Filter replacement costs are higher. Does not remove chemicals and
high concentration of smoke odors. |
  |
 |
Above average in performance with 5 year filter
(expensive) life. Simple design and simple features |
 |
 |
Above average performance used in many
commercial applications. |
 |
 |
Average performance and should be used for mild
allergy sufferers.
|
 |
 |
Popular air cleaner sold in many stores but
performed below average in many of our tests. |
 |
 |
Below average in performance because the filter is
not HEPA grade and did not perform well in our testing. |
|
Friedrich |
 |
Ranked well in Consumer Reports but emits a musty
odor which is associated with harmful ozone. We do not carry
Friedrich C-90 air cleaners because of our stand against ozone producing
units. |
 |
 |
Inadequate performance. The unit does not
remove very many particles. |
|
Oreck XL
Professional |
 |
Poor performance in removing air borne particles.
Despite the commercials on TV, this unit only removed approximately 35%
of the particles. |
|
Sharper Image
Ionic Breeze |
 |
The worst performer in all of our tests. The
lack of air flow prevented the unit from |
|